Need the AD9833 - or any alternative

Hi.
I am new to Fritzing and need the AD9833 as a part. Does anyone has already build this part?
I know I can learn how to create a part - but since this is my first project with Fritzing I hope anyone of You has already built the AD9833 (or an alternative) and can provide it.

Thanks a lot
Regards, Jazzman

Just to update with parts I found on the net:

Or from the blob pages where you can see other fritzing parts/modules:

This is a through hole version. I didn’t change the breadboard pin display, though they are pins and not pads.
AD9833 Module.fzpz (10.8 KB)

Hoping @vanepp approves :slight_smile:

While trying to edit the copper1/copper0 connectors, I just couldn’t get the structure correct with just inkscape. After importing, i did the pin assignments in Fritzing and saved with a new prefix and that seemed to work.

I checked gerber output and all views seem to work as they should. Even if the bread board view is incorrect (vis. pin holes and mounting holes).

It is by and large fine. The only requirement (which is met) is that the name in the svg match the definition for the pin in the fzp file. In this case they are both pad (although conventional is pin, it will work fine with pad.)

    <pcbView>
     <p layer="copper1" svgId="connector4pad"/>
     <p layer="copper0" svgId="connector4pad"/>
    </pcbView>

which matches the label in the pcb svg:

The extra groups circled in red are redundant and can be removed (and I usually do so to avoid translates!) Here I ungrouped the top 3 groups, but Inkscape inserted a transform in copper1

that isn’t in copper0 which will cause a problem (and which FritzingCheckPart.py will toss an error on!)

So you need to delete all the groups and remake the copper1 and copper0 groups by ungouping all the copper layers then selecting the pins and grouping twice

that creates both groups without transrforms (which I do to avoid problems!)

in either group

then rename the groups to copper1 and copper0 and you are done.

Peter

1 Like

Ok, strange that the uploaded version still has ‘pad’. I changed those to pin!

But the grouping with names now makes sense! Thanks!

Normally the first thing I do is totally ungroup any svg I work on. That removes most transforms (but also all the group names which can be a problem if people have used group names as connectorids which unfortunately works!) as it will delete all the connector definitions. At the end of the edit I do a Edit->select all then Edit-resize page to selection to resize the view box then add the necessary groups (which implies that you know what the groups need to look like of course.)

Peter

1 Like